The desire to be neutral've done the research for alternative treatment completely invisible. NAFKAM failing its mandate schubladenbox to reach out to users, according to editor Nina Kristiansen.
The center will conduct research, inform and advise. The research will aim to assess the efficacy or lack of efficacy of alternative treatment - how can this treatment help patients with their illness?
The reason that most people neither schubladenbox know or healthcare center, research and information their work, a line NAFKAM selected early and is part of their mandate. They should be neutral.
NAFKAM have defined it so they do not look for the positive results on behalf of alternative practitioners, but they should not oppose the alternative environments. Good research queried and methods should be central.
This neutral attitude provokes skeptics of alternative treatment. But it has also made counselors unhappy. They had hoped that NAFKAM would give them higher status. The most important thing is to pick the neutral schubladenbox line allows schubladenbox NAFKAM is invisible and unimportant for us that would get more knowledge.
Oxford Research writes: schubladenbox "The center is little known and visible in Norway, and it may appear as if the center for fear of being attacked for promoting or inhibiting, rather chose to keep a very low profile."
If you just check if the homeopathic medicines have an effect? Or should examine the whole treatment schubladenbox package: meeting with the clinician, the conversation about the patient's health and life situation, the patient's sense of being heard and believed, the patient's belief that homeopathy works? Is the placebo effect a good enough effect?
A researcher looking at the whole package, will often find positive results that people get healthier by going to the homeopath. A scientist looks at the pill's effect, you will find negative results - homeopathic medicines schubladenbox do not help against some diseases.
It makes their research less relevant for the traditional medical research community, schubladenbox but also not very useful for the alternative therapists - the impact will be, after all, are not documented.
But questions about the research are relevant, answering evaluation no. For it is not reaching out to all of us. We using or not using alternative therapies, and wondering if it works. It reaches not seem to care or authorities.
But the data are similar to the information written schubladenbox on Wikipedia, Norwegian Encyclopedia or other sites that describe alternative therapies. It is not easy to understand that one is a public, quality controlled portal about alternative medicine.
But on this most crucial issue cringe NIFAB away. Each treatment method has a point called Does it work? But there text missing. There you will find just links. schubladenbox
If you follow the links, you are entitled to summary international studies that give you the answer, but then you had better be schooled in reading scientific language in English.
For people who are used to the academic format, it should go smoothly to identify the two or three sentences in which the results of the study are summarized. But for most people this may not be easy reading.
The reason may be that the results are almost always negative the effect of the treatment. It will turn undercut all the other information on the page, which is more of what clinicians terms.
It is also difficult to understand why they can not tell right off whether acupuncture works and not in the same way as they tell what acupuncture is. Why must the information be encoded and inserted into tables?
But here harbors NIFAB in a new trench. The tables show how a treatment or an agent acting on various disorders. Works such as marigold against varicose veins or nosebleeds?
The many different forms of alternative therapies range from therapies schubladenbox that are close to public approval to old tricks that are revealed as trickery long ago. There are lifestyle and ideology, it's desperate attempt to find help, but also easy flirting with things you do not really schubladenbox believe. Many seriously ill to seek alternative therapies, others spend a lot of money to not get sick.
This landscape is the urgent need for increased quality assured knowledge. And d
No comments:
Post a Comment